Forest Code

Adrians FoSF Report 2009

Adrian's 2016 Year ending Report on Sherwood Forest NNR & SSSi

The Good the Bad and the Fracking Ugly.

This is a long awaited report since my last in 2010

At this point I should mention that Nottinghamshire County Council do not own Sherwood Forest, it is owned by Thoresby Estates, Nott's C.C. only manage the Forest.  The Forest is a National Nature Reserve and also a S.S.S.i. or Site of Special Scientific Interest. In theory to do anything in Sherwood Forest because of it's status you need to apply to Natural England who are the Governing body for that Forest, on satisfactory application they will issue a licence for special events and the such like,  however the terms of the licence granted by N.E. must be strictly adhered to.  So Nott's C.C. fall under the auspices of Natural England and must adhere to any and all conditions or directives issued by N.E.  failure to do so can result in N.E. stepping in in the final outcome and taking over the Forest and purchasing it outright and managing the site themselves, so you would think Nott's C.C. have a heavy burden and a certain responsibility to Thoresby Estates and the Public to see everything is properly administered and in good order, well lets see what this amounts to. 

The Good.

Despite all the trouble in 2016 there has been some real progress made especially with regard to photography.

 

The Bad.

We are not having that sort of thing round here > Izzy Banton Head Ranger

This one is difficult to know where to start,  there is just so much of it,  SOUNDS FAMILIAR...............

 

 

 

 

 

 

if I were asked this a year ago I would possibly have been very vague,  but sad to report it is now difficult to know where to start.  With the commencement of the new year for 2009 came the public viewing of plans for the New Visitor centre,  I had  concerns before this that all was not well ( You will read that phrase many times ).  The New Centre was to be sited across the road from the Forest so it immediately gained our support,  as the old centre was to be demolished and returned to forest.  The plans depicted a structure spanning the road as the only means of access to the Forest i.e. a bridge with a long ramps either side.  In situations like this there must be provision by Law that there be Intermediate stages where Disabled people can stop and rest on the ascent and decent.  There was no provision for any intermediate stages on the Council's plan, this was pointed out and I was questioned as to why they should need to provide these Intermediate stages, I quoted the relevant regulations and within a few minutes back came the reply that they might not build the bridge but opt for a pedestrian crossing instead.  Well at this stage I had hoped I had made a reasonable impression and that in future they really would take me seriously.  Later plans for the new centre were shelved, the reason cited was lack of cash,  this decision was taken in contradiction to the Government order that all SSSi sites should be brought up to an acceptable standard by 2010.  There has been a lot of confusion over this as it was often stated that the Old Visitor Centre had to be moved by 2010, this is not the case it was a Government Order that all SSSi sites be brought up to spec that forced the demolition, or should have done.  Now bear in mind that the Old Visitor centre has only been there for just over thirty years, I would really like to know who was behind the thinking for it, as it had been built right on the top of some precious Veteran Oaks.  There was a lot of hot air and Lame Duck excuses at the start of the year that were not necessary, Councillors were making stupid statements and using phrases such as the Old Visitor Centre was " Tired " utter Bull ! All that needed to be cited was the fact that the Government had dictated that all SSSi sites should be brought up to standard and as this Centre was in the Forest it would have to be moved to comply with the Governments directive.  The new plans dictating the removal of the Old Centre now reveal that some Veteran Oaks are in serious danger and that removing all of the centres foundations could destabilise the trees and cause them to fall as a consequence.  That demonstrates just how little concern the managers have when it comes to Ego trips and personal vanity with regard to planning,  build now and consider the cost later.

 

Towards the end of the year approx 14 dog deaths were reported,  Natural England was conducting toxicology reports on this matter, since then nothing has been heard.

Enclosed Grazing Project.

A grazing project has been set up in Sherwood Forest with English Longhorn cattle,  to all intents and purposes this appears to be a disaster,  except for the farmer involved,  he gets to graze his rare breed cattle on prime land so he can sell Organic rare breed Beef in the shops at whacking great prices, nice.  The cattle tend to herd and use one spot for a toilet, which makes that particularly muddy and unpleasant.  On the day of my visit one of the beasts was eating Oak leaves from a sapling, eat too many and you end up with dead beef.  They are supposed to break down the bracken but the truth is they can't stand the stuff and leave it alone, they much prefer fresh grass,  and will break out of the Grazing area in an attempt to get at better areas of grazing as happened on one of my visits.

A very expensive project that will only satisfy the farmer, providing the cattle stay put,  during the summer bracken can reach a height of five feet or more.

General Issues.

I have  been prepared to take a higher viewpoint with a lot of issues and rise above any personal feelings I may have one way or another so it came as a shock when offers of assistance I made to Nott's C.C, were rejected completely out of hand without even the slightest of consideration at all, this is the definitive decision making process that is often adhered to regardless.  I had my suspicions that there was one rule for the Council and another for others, several offers of assistance had been rejected out of hand by the Head Ranger Izi Banton to the tune of " We are not having that sort of thing round here " This was repeated on a second occasion regarding a different matter word perfect. Well what was so dreadful to deserve a comment of that nature, first subject was the proposal to have a tree to hang remembrance cards or tags from with a service at the end of the nominated two week programme.  Well two weeks after that remark by Banton look what appeared in the Visitor centre.  On the second occasion I was greeted with the same reply when I asked for Wedding cars to be allowed access to the  Major Oak so that newly married couples could have a blessing by an approved Minister at the Oak.  Yes exactly the same reply, and they were hoping to hold Wedding Receptions at the new visitor centre, bit of a disgrace if you ask me.  Further offers were made with regard to technical assistance with Halloween night, this was dropped like a hot brick after the Robin Hood Festival, and you are about to find out why.

The Robin Hood Festival was very popular to say the least with huge numbers of people attending,  that was no real surprise when you consider the coverage they were getting on Radio Nottingham alone. The public had no idea about Health and safety issues and generally most people will tell you that they had enjoyed themselves, Ohh ignorance is bliss if you can pardon the phrase.  As stated before I had my suspicions that all was not well and that were substantial violations were taking place,  remember this is a very environmentally sensitive area and under strict licence. First visit during the day made the hairs  at the back of my neck curl, Tree climbers, large numbers of people in a small area, open fires that looked iffy and the feeling that I was being watched, not to mention the fenced ground around the Major Oak being used as an area for fighting demonstrations, the resulting mess left by this activity was nothing more than typical of the attitude of " Do as we say not as we do"  Anyone trying that on themselves would soon receive an ear wigging in double time.  I had no idea about the terms of the licence issued for that event but I felt anyone granting permission for this charade must be mad.  After my day visit I decided to make a house call late at night, what a shock, 11.30pm and the first pitch I came across belonged to the Sherwood Forest Trust ( SFT ),  they had pressure lanterns burning and four members were sat in a open fronted canvas tent with a card school in full swing,  they were totally unconcerned at the antics no more than 100 yards away from them. It was obvious from the SFT pitch that all was not well down at the Major Oak.  I continued walking down the path to be greeted by the sight of open fires and garden flares burning. There must have been anything up to a dozen of these torches blazing and I suspected that alcohol was being consumed.  Open fires in such a sensitive area, it defies belief,  I contacted the Council regarding this and the head of the Parks dept Mr Nick Broomhead phoned me back saying he would personally get this matter sorted, sadly Broomhead's efforts were ineffectual, that's being polite.  I repeated my late night house call on the following Friday only to be greeted with the same site at the Major Oak with open fires and even more garden torches burning, an absolute disgrace and abuse of privilege by the Council contractors involved, the SFT had probably got wind of what was happening and their pitch was apparently vacant.  I stopped just before the Oak for about sixty seconds feeling complete rage and disgust at the management for what I was witnessing, I returned back up the path to my car. I contacted Broomhead and he seemed annoyed with me that I should contact him regarding this again. Natural England were contacted and a copy of the Licence issued for this event was obtained.  At least 12 violations were immediately noted and a full report was submitted to N.E. including Images with a view to prosecuting the council. You can no doubt guess the outcome N.E. dismissed as many incidents as they possibly could some were so well founded that there could not in any way shape or form be any possible argument,  however as N.E. and Nott's C.C. are cosy bedfellows the decision not to prosecute was taken, however the N.E. officer responsible for issuing permission for this event did say these incidents would not go unnoticed.  What did the Fire Service have to say about all this,  the Officer I spoke to had no record of any contact regarding the Robin Hood Festival and he asked what it was all about,  consider this event has now been held for over 25 years,  gob smacked.  The Fire service issue a 160 page document covering outdoor events and it is a statutory requirement that any person holding an event of this nature complete a comprehensive risk assessment in conjunction with the Fire Service.

Tree Climbers Sherwood ForestTree Climber Sherwood Forest

Tree Climbers - Sherwood Forest Robin Hood Festival.

If you wish to attend an event organised at Sherwood forest please remember there are risks involved, in the event of a fire canvass will burn and add considerably to the problem,  look for fire extinguishers and ancillary equipment, ask yourself how long would it take you to get out of there and could you run faster than a Forest fire can spread, and would you know in which direction to run.  There was a lack of trained staff at the Robin Hood Festival but Banton the organiser decided to press ahead regardless,  who would help you out in an emergency.  We have refused to assist the Council in finding Volunteers because we could not in all honesty feel confident about the welfare of anyone recruited under such conditions.  The Council maintain a stranglehold on Sherwood Forest and will only allow there own Contractors on site,  so all events are totally controlled by them, pity some of these Contractors choose to be reckless and irresponsible in such an environmentally sensitive area. We will continue to monitor the situation for future events and look for a considerable improvement in circumstances and behaviour.

The Fracking Ugly.

 

 

The Second of the two ugly incidents I was subjected to involved being on the receiving end of death threats from a 4 x 4 driver one evening, whether by coincidence or not but this was on the night when another Bash was being held in Sherwood Forest, it is not clear if the individual responsible for this was connected to the Council's organised event or not, it did seem suspicious as did the response from the local Police.  I trust the idiot who perpetrated this crime is aware that issuing death threats is one of the more serious offences in the U.K. and regarded in legal terms as equal to Murder itself.

This is the first time in the History of Sherwood Forest that the lid has been taken off and the whole world can actually get to know and see what is happening.

This report is by no means comprehensive, provision has been made for members to discuss matters mentioned above and ask any questions concerning this report on FACEBOOK - Thank you.

I hope and trust I never have to write a report of this nature ever again, > if I'm honest I do not think this is the first or the last.  Well that was a surprise !   Here we are again..........

Signed,

Adrian Wilson.

FoSF Founder and Governor.

 

Sherwood Forest NVC  plans are now with Newark and Sherwood Council  Our objection runs to 5,500 words over 34 pages  CLICK HERE to READ

 

Home >< Major Oak >< February 20th >< Reports >< Photography <> Wedding Photography <> Webmaster >< Downloads >< Weddings >< News >< Blogs >< Contact > Sitemap ><  FAQ's >< Services

Copyright 2014 Friends of Sherwood Forest.